{"id":"W4283080319","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2022.111410","title":"Vulpedia: Detecting vulnerable ethereum smart contracts via abstracted vulnerability signatures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Computer science; Soundness; Vulnerability (computing); Construct (python library); Smart contract; Computer security; Precision and recall; Asynchrony (computer programming); Static analysis; Data mining; Machine learning; Blockchain; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001520672,0.0007059366,0.0007016356,0.002021418,0.0004672826,0.00125854,0.001364031,0.001772828,0.002307617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009185071,0.0005037668,0.0005916852,0.0007902913,0.001019784,0.003821816,0.004292679,0.001164824,0.0009761615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006184165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369277,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009265732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001423803,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973537,0.0005105225,0.0001588625,0.0003791035,0.001245836,0.0003520414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955142,0.001856576,0.0006791616,0.001359415,0.0004199705,0.0001706794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002835983,0.0008055877,0.08825754,0.0009820438,0.0006791303,0.00323792,0.001044079,0.1640437,0.1063353,0.08256062,0.02940617,0.519812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096911,0.000289218,0.004125086,0.00008421557,0.00005825714,0.0008833122,0.000203714,0.9047965,0.04310817,0.03824009,0.00804637,0.00006819725],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4273144,0.0008159245,0.5276455,0.0006348333,0.0002390815,0.000408379,0.002437135,0.03373747,0.006767272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067199,0.000166344,0.08826125,0.0001518754,0.00002750361,0.0001082663,0.001394867,0.0004569252,0.002713167],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002307617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008042216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01025832189138637,"score_gpt":0.230845469373711,"score_spread":0.2205871474823247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}