{"id":"W4283220805","doi":"10.1007/s40037-022-00717-9","title":"Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal <em>Perspectives on Medical Education</em>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Metadata; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.124765,0.000731195,0.001928493,0.04504807,0.00867016,0.0130321,0.003128323,0.00337293,0.002375101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.260303,0.0008922109,0.002123974,0.08446629,0.006037547,0.01421659,0.007706714,0.001638199,0.0003606033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01030401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009763275,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007683342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01576952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8249137,0.1303748,0.01290378,0.00643587,0.0222832,0.00308858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5015007,0.4072494,0.04508071,0.02271137,0.01983224,0.003625601],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005336338,0.0005913861,0.5048411,0.008656055,0.002054692,0.009900006,0.3111628,0.00122269,0.001236529,0.04042874,0.0108476,0.1085247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001725672,0.0005728711,0.2432236,0.01230377,0.00199797,0.009726923,0.5936317,0.01027817,0.003017631,0.0274284,0.09733839,0.0003080156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9322114,0.01309094,0.01630424,0.01456253,0.0002503786,0.001486098,0.002360314,0.0001166577,0.01961744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703406,0.003961663,0.02189483,0.000785848,0.0002027579,0.0009872298,0.0009241471,0.00009267463,0.0008103498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6598284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3729390460331222,"score_gpt":0.5601110664533843,"score_spread":0.187172020420262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}