{"id":"W4283704156","doi":"10.1177/01655515221097623","title":"Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Citation; Credibility; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Inference; Web of science; Process (computing); Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07021914,0.0006436546,0.0009041068,0.007560421,0.002779608,0.006813935,0.002460729,0.004386676,0.006238515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6069822,0.0005937679,0.001476416,0.008236666,0.005218009,0.009546523,0.003123861,0.003478991,0.001410469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001824463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004625547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001620528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001543405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.884712,0.06414255,0.01600807,0.005846651,0.02671888,0.002571961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1842811,0.6138671,0.1257545,0.02969768,0.04235531,0.0040445],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003217581,0.001207229,0.4488672,0.01122773,0.00188193,0.002120601,0.07058508,0.0005643577,0.002383345,0.009670546,0.005936375,0.4423381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009173016,0.003655689,0.8325053,0.01138527,0.003249909,0.004594101,0.04682227,0.002431276,0.006175666,0.03377758,0.05417086,0.00031481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237218,0.03116368,0.004542602,0.01752133,0.0006919368,0.0004726932,0.0003177779,0.0001260238,0.0214421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865099,0.007775867,0.002478754,0.00127656,0.0005404481,0.000107701,0.0001233636,0.00004800213,0.001139348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3713588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09565337181427233,"score_gpt":0.4232145193544133,"score_spread":0.327561147540141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}