{"id":"W4284960560","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2021-0503","title":"Bridge infrastructure resilience assessment against seismic hazard using Bayesian best worst method","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Resilience (materials science); Seismic hazard; Hazard; Reliability (semiconductor); Index (typography); Computer science; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007077343,0.000301287,0.0004727548,0.0009317477,0.0003760644,0.000118864,0.0005869449,0.00009271943,0.0005314735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008204103,0.0003359468,0.000238672,0.0009657763,0.00004533692,0.0003527872,0.00004058898,0.001252753,0.000001241361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001542513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009647852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005642043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008770911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979662,0.00008586037,0.0006389013,0.0002115158,0.0004447733,0.0006527418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986969,0.0000753068,0.0001415342,0.0003197606,0.0001105008,0.0006560057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002031544,0.000003457296,0.002262714,0.00005310828,0.00009786293,0.0001857776,0.0002803957,0.9909012,0.002799965,0.00005068442,0.0008119963,0.002550856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002127914,0.00005139808,0.006165805,0.00007641842,0.00008472925,0.0005047077,0.0003247006,0.9801515,0.0002520677,0.0001386471,0.01166208,0.0003751762],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1949261,0.0007175808,0.8015844,0.0001171554,0.001312093,0.0001199996,0.00005692416,0.0000477744,0.001118048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879993,0.00001941559,0.01146086,0.00009649557,0.0003382764,0.000004789308,0.000005960026,0.0000594947,0.00001542245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7930732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007708322472085859,"score_gpt":0.2379071167605312,"score_spread":0.2301987942884454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}