{"id":"W4285030928","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2091311","title":"Trust, trustworthiness, and relationships: ontological reflections on public trust in science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Trustworthiness; Situated; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Express trust; Public trust; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005925532,0.00006468497,0.0001326354,0.0009918095,0.002107369,0.0001604495,0.0002209412,0.00006396529,0.00009215835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004454929,0.0000561547,0.00002973898,0.007279297,0.000346188,0.0008838047,0.00004573372,0.0006766527,0.00000120325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006128775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001192047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008810562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005665073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980015,0.0004981359,0.0004329376,0.0001286494,0.0007360201,0.0002027659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998742,0.0002259378,0.0003625896,0.00006657744,0.0005472576,0.00005561551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002490783,0.0001165794,0.04641316,0.000001766371,0.000005513291,0.00001572104,0.008049949,0.0002424797,0.0009508423,0.9344983,0.0002269726,0.009229612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001269794,0.0007642555,0.6142089,0.00004378354,0.00001718691,0.0001366479,0.09637893,0.0005731309,0.00004195994,0.2064455,0.0798021,0.0003178637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703531,0.00004647672,0.00004619209,0.01466514,0.0004640372,0.0001076494,0.000001787283,0.00001693653,0.01429873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982851,0.00004934538,0.0006029828,0.0002966947,0.0001448169,0.000008308781,0.000001801995,0.00000364812,0.0006073328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7280529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1401417558138596,"score_gpt":0.3928602569775393,"score_spread":0.2527185011636797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}