{"id":"W4285030928","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2091311","title":"Trust, trustworthiness, and relationships: ontological reflections on public trust in science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Trustworthiness; Situated; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Express trust; Public trust; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03395559,0.0006914031,0.001325458,0.005859803,0.009530742,0.02209896,0.002606399,0.009981548,0.002552342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04850271,0.0007678311,0.001271741,0.005657115,0.1090724,0.04212369,0.01374897,0.0110603,0.0004013846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006617887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007359225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003081242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9675353,0.02266686,0.001949496,0.001725202,0.004611371,0.00151186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278476,0.05597444,0.005919203,0.00465093,0.003988819,0.001618953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006169831,0.000007240888,0.0001792919,0.00004143318,0.000005719509,0.0000608099,0.01285615,0.0001501792,0.00002901395,0.9847173,0.0003131777,0.001633414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000482313,0.00000989896,0.0002123896,0.0001409767,0.000007515372,0.00007997772,0.004894335,0.0005072102,0.00005285216,0.9848074,0.009267798,0.00001487398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08463901,0.03601977,0.235326,0.3349938,0.002239895,0.0001707472,0.0001885966,0.0001548276,0.3062674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807163,0.005242869,0.008356475,0.002819473,0.0007419495,0.000132481,0.00003112989,0.00005697648,0.001902371],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1795765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1401417558138596,"score_gpt":0.3928602569775393,"score_spread":0.2527185011636797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}