{"id":"W4285041865","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2022.960957","title":"Levels of Evidence, Quality Assessment, and Risk of Bias: Evaluating the Internal Validity of Primary Research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Internal validity; External validity; Context (archaeology); Judgement; Quality (philosophy); Criterion validity; Publication bias; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Applied psychology; Construct validity; Statistics; Social psychology; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7400284,0.004368828,0.02596845,0.04990962,0.008075311,0.0367965,0.0119677,0.02481028,0.008216856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9115012,0.005559281,0.03003242,0.03374933,0.02217809,0.02084705,0.01820455,0.02044216,0.002355829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04654668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07396279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01225369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00961964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.09888473,0.5087618,0.2499904,0.01460105,0.1251408,0.002621392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.032295,0.7779856,0.08135764,0.02631394,0.07888107,0.0031668],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002527011,0.0003182676,0.02177612,0.5528238,0.05828684,0.0004422781,0.005601751,0.003123129,0.0006500137,0.05126955,0.02593855,0.2772428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002439167,0.001068348,0.01741988,0.7340437,0.03088276,0.0009766428,0.00225733,0.008388707,0.001647163,0.1328798,0.06694953,0.001046963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00938763,0.594749,0.1442679,0.1254023,0.01878152,0.07401102,0.00702448,0.001115478,0.02526068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2230441,0.1247571,0.4604374,0.02922317,0.007173705,0.149314,0.00392288,0.0006276632,0.001500041],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2599716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3377214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9864849765191429,"score_gpt":0.7286708760413659,"score_spread":0.257814100477777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}