{"id":"W4285083393","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1687","title":"<i>Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences</i>: A Retrospective Review Using Bibliometric Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Knowledge management; Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Bibliometrics; Human resources; Business; Political science; Management; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"review","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02451976,0.0009660673,0.003412977,0.06699388,0.005925509,0.003302114,0.003848495,0.0003728479,0.001523611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01886978,0.0008819408,0.001894106,0.1997992,0.008902316,0.004240435,0.0001070007,0.001526906,0.000008347969],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006737218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1412867,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07605619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7692932,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899832,0.0007944119,0.004322443,0.001267627,0.001490143,0.002142161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806065,0.001021407,0.01333259,0.0005209034,0.002949145,0.001569462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002460396,0.0009094987,0.1650931,0.05976988,0.007442118,0.03900049,0.01513993,0.003355629,0.00005271422,0.09613109,0.005869358,0.6069902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007163014,0.009008621,0.005941823,0.03536535,0.017713,0.0170222,0.01969296,0.001272352,0.00001486788,0.02173359,0.8672336,0.00428535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04845025,0.9348028,0.0003172259,0.0006173369,0.002262816,0.001411818,0.0003079285,0.00001867743,0.01181109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4779646,0.5109933,0.006689392,0.001026712,0.002730972,0.0000512045,0.00007908775,0.0001310595,0.000333705],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8613642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2673537246943422,"score_gpt":0.4011517614919263,"score_spread":0.1337980367975842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}