{"id":"W4285218571","doi":"10.3982/ecta18137","title":"Randomize at Your Own Risk: On the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Erasmus Research Institute of Management; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Observability; Incentive; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Isolation (microbiology); Incentive compatibility; Economics; Hedge; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01331322,0.0004052727,0.000872225,0.0004644651,0.0003811078,0.001584918,0.000487004,0.0007162563,0.003163208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05103552,0.0003229374,0.0006450099,0.0002905415,0.003417472,0.002316208,0.001722555,0.001964406,0.000178892],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003858016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003391069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004231429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002918046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954704,0.002831045,0.0001811269,0.0006618634,0.0005983089,0.0002572848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336927,0.04998768,0.0062115,0.00855001,0.0006046065,0.00095352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009511449,0.00227294,0.1653679,0.0006188767,0.00154452,0.001005619,0.005471141,0.06227646,0.05210406,0.466571,0.001823462,0.2314326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009108108,0.002431486,0.1238176,0.0001953404,0.0004345856,0.0008369648,0.0011507,0.1519952,0.01379769,0.7007226,0.003484202,0.0002227359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256254,0.0003206375,0.06349891,0.001203923,0.00002149656,0.00007376266,0.00003628626,0.00004245037,0.009177049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944999,0.0001138809,0.004768516,0.0001952718,0.0000193602,0.0000372082,0.00001165866,0.000009607043,0.0003444599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01331322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07040787,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2863624354357056,"score_gpt":0.3775546163438651,"score_spread":0.09119218090815956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}