{"id":"W4285218571","doi":"10.3982/ecta18137","title":"Randomize at Your Own Risk: On the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Erasmus Research Institute of Management; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Observability; Incentive; Risk aversion (psychology); Econometrics; Isolation (microbiology); Incentive compatibility; Economics; Hedge; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01055978,0.0001539613,0.0005510594,0.0006488581,0.0008025115,0.000109063,0.00157703,0.00005145587,0.01553341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093769,0.00009751254,0.0004626457,0.002012375,0.000134988,0.0001459693,0.001087607,0.0003255625,0.0008969408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004141626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006238488,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001330412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001489537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966232,0.0007081893,0.001013673,0.0006386381,0.0007710058,0.0002453321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878162,0.009547563,0.0009563145,0.001456482,0.0001145619,0.0001089094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003104315,0.001005129,0.2653816,0.000002990689,0.00005753755,0.000008501111,0.0009784685,0.006364243,0.00008457027,0.0006158791,0.1030569,0.6193399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007126041,0.001171995,0.3612758,0.000007658693,0.00008082436,0.00001146725,0.002971216,0.005107224,0.0009260309,0.1117112,0.508963,0.0006475326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986285,0.00007264275,0.00003413235,0.001043408,0.0009101427,0.0002951529,0.0002728149,0.00002152039,0.01106514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972737,0.00002046322,0.0001020067,0.0002423568,0.00003572116,0.00002897024,0.000004177144,0.00001009437,0.002282444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6186923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2863624354357056,"score_gpt":0.3775546163438651,"score_spread":0.09119218090815956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}