{"id":"W4285364397","doi":"10.2196/33703","title":"Evaluation of the Clinical, Technical, and Financial Aspects of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Scoping Review and Framework of Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Informatics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Health technology; Economic evaluation; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Payment; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Risk analysis (engineering); Health care; Management science; Cost effectiveness; Computer science; Engineering; Pathology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1621787,0.003572471,0.01235192,0.05697245,0.002443332,0.01598115,0.004871671,0.00564131,0.005672293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4315681,0.002131953,0.01869266,0.03469085,0.004170248,0.008782512,0.00503647,0.004381921,0.0005253309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03152693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04835223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01101168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01455047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8241677,0.09390519,0.04477682,0.004857882,0.02994832,0.002344104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4753859,0.4537668,0.0300588,0.005663689,0.03413434,0.0009904759],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003258378,0.00008080333,0.001927192,0.7935398,0.01623975,0.0001453528,0.0008394783,0.002464175,0.0002012308,0.01670394,0.00301037,0.1645222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009065016,0.0001554304,0.00158566,0.9493636,0.02581517,0.0001499038,0.000593668,0.001053785,0.0003241011,0.00589388,0.01492236,0.00005186948],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00159174,0.9827064,0.005013893,0.003341713,0.0005530826,0.003018945,0.0007637148,0.00002881026,0.002981664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05581979,0.9123535,0.01876433,0.00180362,0.0005377346,0.009539303,0.0008140609,0.00004381562,0.0003238813],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8378213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8576933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2385034995205139,"score_gpt":0.5470788065706624,"score_spread":0.3085753070501486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}