{"id":"W4285596949","doi":"10.3390/en15145123","title":"Quantitative Analysis of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Policies: Perspectives of Policy Content Validity and Carbon Emissions Reduction Effect","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energies","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Divisia index; Greenhouse gas; Beijing; Environmental economics; Index (typography); Carbon fibers; China; Policy analysis; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental science; Public economics; Efficient energy use; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02452351,0.0004540157,0.0005672048,0.005324899,0.0008774232,0.002193847,0.0006597136,0.0004367501,0.001386406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06140944,0.000213533,0.0007076481,0.008322155,0.002667948,0.002381363,0.001374513,0.0006923272,0.00008867412],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00693018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006067495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01884787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008267211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859081,0.006827719,0.001403612,0.001222137,0.003999576,0.0006388954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347008,0.0416085,0.008409214,0.00358372,0.01118711,0.0005106902],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003866743,0.0002123416,0.7959245,0.001162996,0.0008113649,0.0002412713,0.009320521,0.02639303,0.003182811,0.08158998,0.002156546,0.07861793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004243773,0.0002030248,0.9205755,0.0002289026,0.0002469381,0.00004965951,0.006496999,0.03815337,0.003538762,0.02254442,0.00784471,0.00007526791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9608513,0.0004950849,0.01606412,0.001452182,0.00004095235,0.0003627944,0.001947431,0.00007104195,0.01871503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967986,0.00009307173,0.00207474,0.00005512351,0.00001345579,0.0001576475,0.000480746,0.000008621204,0.0003179671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02452351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02957571891003922,"score_gpt":0.294962863186857,"score_spread":0.2653871442768178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}