{"id":"W4286490894","doi":"10.1080/01605682.2022.2096502","title":"Verifying and managing additive consistency and deriving weights for hesitant fuzzy preference relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Ambiguity; Preference; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Weak consistency; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Strong consistency; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01632687,0.001376623,0.00156656,0.003981303,0.001272993,0.003813826,0.002068212,0.001231809,0.00148759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04449694,0.001042154,0.001846385,0.003502991,0.001941203,0.006367527,0.003403502,0.002301298,0.000235078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001501577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002392218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001616508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00127889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9840513,0.007758903,0.001450806,0.001718331,0.004362802,0.0006579259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788285,0.01324922,0.002075268,0.00202504,0.003470941,0.0003510543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004186542,0.0002708276,0.005945413,0.0005962405,0.0005335518,0.0004542876,0.002620397,0.3258704,0.009746002,0.3918067,0.0009302452,0.2608073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003472359,0.0001271562,0.0005825934,0.00006019781,0.00009879113,0.0001159266,0.0003346242,0.8465937,0.006001293,0.1449975,0.0009918106,0.0000616176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02187426,0.00005790485,0.9769876,0.00005202709,0.00001101602,0.00007437314,0.00001881709,0.00004466878,0.0008792673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4299785,0.0001358113,0.5687526,0.0000402704,0.00003438615,0.0002248945,0.0000931183,0.00003933476,0.000701099],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01632687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08634573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3586288390354071,"score_gpt":0.4722877858035818,"score_spread":0.1136589467681747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}