{"id":"W4286490894","doi":"10.1080/01605682.2022.2096502","title":"Verifying and managing additive consistency and deriving weights for hesitant fuzzy preference relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Operational Research Society","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Ambiguity; Preference; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Weak consistency; Fuzzy logic; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Strong consistency; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01268034,0.00008684833,0.0001972578,0.0001654271,0.003511127,0.0006622908,0.0006163197,0.00003530711,0.0002993149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008005433,0.00005474153,0.0001712044,0.0005212174,0.000245826,0.0006118546,0.0008458346,0.0006442468,0.000002244804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002039227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004847667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005987652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006750277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995236,0.000827501,0.0006344668,0.000268186,0.002802894,0.0002309255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893376,0.008462382,0.0002993848,0.0002279198,0.001557178,0.000115503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001390086,0.0005985121,0.04195711,0.00009731673,0.0008327361,0.00006335856,0.06375599,0.01027533,0.07075612,0.2656068,0.3791835,0.1654832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002694346,0.0006276655,0.1934062,0.0002977843,0.00005524087,0.0006111991,0.04507163,0.1866944,0.0005920089,0.4749474,0.0945813,0.0004207388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682824,0.001429404,0.009079183,0.01866735,0.0005087726,0.0006699271,0.0001257673,0.00000611253,0.001231062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748994,0.00009979671,0.02336059,0.0002601119,0.0001252725,0.00002801363,0.000001309059,0.000008682289,0.001216823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2846022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977862,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3586288390354071,"score_gpt":0.4722877858035818,"score_spread":0.1136589467681747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}