{"id":"W4287585121","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2012.00260","title":"Near-Optimal Control Strategy in Leader-Follower Networks: A Case Study\\n for Linear Quadratic Mean-Field Teams","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Graph; Quadratic equation; State (computer science); Mathematics; Function (biology); Computer science; Convergence (economics); Optimal control; Control (management); Control theory (sociology); Theoretical computer science; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001471122,0.0005804952,0.0008475007,0.0004685174,0.001065411,0.0009773877,0.0009575266,0.001818579,0.001430744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00224216,0.0002433307,0.0006199093,0.0003941138,0.0009120487,0.0007971909,0.001009182,0.000790015,0.0001065665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006290912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005710307,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004657398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002812522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993858,0.0002578491,0.0000228882,0.0001146763,0.000111514,0.0001072145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998645,0.0007779423,0.0002263583,0.00004928854,0.0001596743,0.000141811],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006719419,0.00008298499,0.0007562205,0.00005854335,0.00003045606,0.0005300251,0.0001316531,0.979515,0.0009409899,0.01263678,0.0003021324,0.004948066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001552826,0.00007893298,0.0001057775,0.000002694226,0.000005794602,0.00003635371,0.00005336163,0.9963128,0.00014934,0.003028514,0.0002065569,0.000004363071],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2972867,0.0005827915,0.6892917,0.000777512,0.00006926879,0.0001470263,0.00005025556,0.0001108148,0.01168382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839829,0.0001271645,0.01307114,0.00003872766,0.00002160344,0.0000615216,0.00001834354,0.000006104565,0.002672449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004657398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009260535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08730076364931984,"score_gpt":0.2301086056218565,"score_spread":0.1428078419725367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}