{"id":"W4287782224","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.01640","title":"Subjective Equilibria under Beliefs of Exogenous Uncertainty for Dynamic Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Property (philosophy); Nash equilibrium; Process (computing); Economics; Incentive; Sequential equilibrium; Stochastic process; Computer science; Mathematics; Equilibrium selection; Microeconomics; Game theory; Repeated game","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002382593,0.000743925,0.0006385716,0.0006901214,0.0007684804,0.002665278,0.0009072311,0.001336611,0.0037521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01228268,0.0003555925,0.000833029,0.0007357218,0.002324291,0.004021395,0.001853349,0.001851227,0.0003544695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001561708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007256309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001525154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001075565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981231,0.0009413398,0.0001009494,0.0002673843,0.0003539335,0.0002132231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995204,0.003088224,0.0008169349,0.0002535844,0.000388768,0.0002485032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000184397,0.00001997126,0.0003188388,0.00002921119,0.00001697964,0.00007117634,0.0001957702,0.01631795,0.0004425533,0.9794286,0.0002938261,0.002846682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001735418,0.00001914788,0.0001977582,0.00001643942,0.000008416926,0.00003403888,0.0001190517,0.142029,0.000236896,0.8563825,0.0009251929,0.00001405245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1278836,0.0003766081,0.8422335,0.001597339,0.00006445851,0.00008338027,0.0001250501,0.00008357986,0.0275526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955064,0.000506456,0.03892621,0.0002165444,0.0001094747,0.0002312759,0.0001053759,0.00002983968,0.004810678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01260048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1073368766671961,"score_gpt":0.18879513481203,"score_spread":0.08145825814483389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}