{"id":"W4288487023","doi":"10.56094/jss.v55i1.54","title":"Programmable Logic Device (PLD) Safety Design Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of System Safety","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Fuze; Functional safety; Firmware; Programmable logic device; System safety; Avionics; Safety assurance; Engineering; Process (computing); Systems engineering; Life-critical system; Aerospace; Computer science; Safety standards; Reliability engineering; Programmable logic controller; Embedded system; Software; Computer hardware; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323977,0.0006322794,0.00024953,0.00117889,0.000687025,0.00239582,0.001515973,0.00113941,0.008111087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001956585,0.0003507891,0.0006085563,0.0004408128,0.001097465,0.001407982,0.001477535,0.001495821,0.002465005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001480668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003131702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001374964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001768223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979297,0.0003661333,0.0001326248,0.0002935249,0.001145985,0.0001320771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989997,0.0002903056,0.0000849627,0.0001958897,0.0003967058,0.00003253888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001087137,0.000119044,0.001007689,0.0007035534,0.00004692765,0.0003745817,0.0003679209,0.04301302,0.02081362,0.6826723,0.01147456,0.239298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001168855,0.0004516965,0.0005799569,0.0004516732,0.00009434453,0.001143367,0.0002259523,0.2063439,0.05320691,0.2380705,0.4992428,0.00007201556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002522986,0.0003942809,0.9370881,0.0007540797,0.0001123644,0.0002661525,0.0001589239,0.0007103769,0.05799275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1834612,0.001558327,0.7682536,0.00156316,0.0001255381,0.0008247818,0.0004314588,0.0001873266,0.04359459],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008111087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0271343,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1035996160519689,"score_gpt":0.3384988922738826,"score_spread":0.2348992762219137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}