{"id":"W4289745204","doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2022.938085","title":"Using animal history to inform current debates in gene editing farm animals: A systematic review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Scholarship; Animal welfare; Corporate governance; Productivity; Livestock; Animal ethics; Politics; Genome editing; Environmental ethics; Political science; Biology; Biotechnology; Business; Ecology; Economics; Economic growth; Genome; Genetics; Law; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01178471,0.0008594483,0.003204358,0.01821683,0.0006108644,0.003174254,0.001408027,0.001928916,0.004140098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05332047,0.000729217,0.002657132,0.01872491,0.001660283,0.004514368,0.001698484,0.00120783,0.0003607101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003290567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008559617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02601392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918583,0.003682829,0.002323155,0.0006235448,0.00128824,0.000223973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320387,0.05790667,0.005140833,0.0007617549,0.003780219,0.0003718832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007415903,0.00001598745,0.001208774,0.8514541,0.002046041,0.0002533269,0.002111931,0.000125813,0.0002459831,0.003297305,0.005490767,0.1336758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002643905,0.00005349949,0.002898365,0.8946707,0.006176369,0.000389345,0.001629274,0.000042583,0.000102946,0.001025183,0.09295611,0.00002916575],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005804128,0.9980696,0.0001587008,0.000508838,0.00009941706,0.00004390205,0.0001876099,0.000003316438,0.0003482465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006940908,0.9916447,0.0004148135,0.0005639819,0.00006160438,0.0001278597,0.0001444869,0.000004306985,0.00009734962],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01821683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06232429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.173920344202773,"score_gpt":0.3826640924560213,"score_spread":0.2087437482532483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}