{"id":"W4291010744","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v11i2.889","title":"Legible, visible, conspicuous: disabled ingenuity and “ability accommodations” in the disability memoir","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Disability studies; Rhetorical question; Embodied cognition; Narrative; Ingenuity; Psychology; Disabled people; Ableism; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Literature; Psychotherapist; Gender studies; Art; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007695855,0.0001798099,0.0004682422,0.00008164012,0.002682676,0.0001752207,0.0006659356,0.00005964532,0.0003222886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003472818,0.0001255831,0.0001708275,0.0008592397,0.0080477,0.0005687099,0.0001182197,0.0005515096,0.000001227402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00187914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009070329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07984746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7296875,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951684,0.002544515,0.0008089949,0.0003459938,0.0006532411,0.0004788351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968185,0.00182417,0.0002697256,0.0004830441,0.0002721909,0.0003323181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003561335,0.0003432615,0.9008651,0.00005593078,0.00006389918,0.000006927309,0.07179308,0.0001476943,0.000002071276,0.02133655,0.001038896,0.004310978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005056032,0.0001345569,0.5735788,0.00001822928,0.00006540838,0.00001201848,0.2987341,0.00001354128,0.000002909301,0.1007808,0.02594819,0.0002058837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305458,0.001058195,0.000004269798,0.06377606,0.0005460163,0.0007092186,0.00006900571,0.00001059388,0.003280818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993089,0.00009645596,0.0000473094,0.0002624317,0.0001679021,0.00005783864,0.000004509216,0.000007472841,0.00004715202],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.64984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06870703373935869,"score_gpt":0.367349633707497,"score_spread":0.2986425999681384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}