{"id":"W4291016652","doi":"10.3390/ijerph19169887","title":"Evaluation of the Carbon Sink Capacity of the Proposed Kunlun Mountain National Park","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Forestry and Grassland Administration","keywords":"National park; Sink (geography); Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Climate change; Computer science; Ecology; Archaeology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01628482,0.00007619829,0.0001382672,0.0001131954,0.0002528243,0.00002402232,0.0008494852,0.00002687017,0.0007782278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007979022,0.0000493125,0.0000750216,0.0002440985,0.0005051038,0.0001750661,0.0006473533,0.0004877949,0.000001826373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003110107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005628492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001156629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001743053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891238,0.002379545,0.0005097454,0.0001445989,0.007604466,0.0002378201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987528,0.0002483543,0.0005815305,0.0001610758,0.000130541,0.0001256766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002810067,0.003828161,0.8070473,0.0000600451,0.000408234,0.000004958431,0.004548247,0.004893202,0.08222914,0.001438556,0.003053573,0.09220754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001583582,0.0008329452,0.9645037,0.00005010605,0.00001081786,0.0001736079,0.001256562,0.01495232,0.003010032,0.004484846,0.009036781,0.0001046793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901388,0.0001415151,0.000004522791,0.007592661,0.0003523616,0.0004549492,0.0000934644,0.000001145153,0.001220562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996303,0.00003393856,0.00002995106,0.0001550257,0.00006242357,0.00001033035,0.000002911388,0.000007378168,0.00006776375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1574564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8521048,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0767170646625442,"score_gpt":0.3494730676597297,"score_spread":0.2727560029971856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}