{"id":"W4291016652","doi":"10.3390/ijerph19169887","title":"Evaluation of the Carbon Sink Capacity of the Proposed Kunlun Mountain National Park","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Forestry and Grassland Administration","keywords":"National park; Sink (geography); Carbon sink; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Climate change; Computer science; Ecology; Archaeology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006822662,0.0003853626,0.0002277649,0.0005835434,0.0003497537,0.0007706254,0.000595348,0.0004675234,0.0009163098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000983328,0.0001380278,0.0004334498,0.000583578,0.0003085512,0.001278896,0.0004428125,0.0002784753,0.00005630436],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001173054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001097795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02560059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03110282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998271,0.00005253259,0.00001020046,0.00003338595,0.00003180622,0.00004499951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996717,0.00008867585,0.00004786885,0.00003105513,0.0001048837,0.00005581452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002963963,0.0001902422,0.2221737,0.0001658607,0.0001390155,0.0005217897,0.0001396685,0.7493818,0.00523418,0.002896504,0.0006222773,0.01823862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004979162,0.0002010667,0.1026904,0.00002144206,0.00009084297,0.00009391687,0.0005934492,0.892116,0.002331563,0.0008397009,0.0009364065,0.0000355792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961405,0.00007559872,0.001867631,0.00007286,0.000006956472,0.00002348864,0.0002781935,0.00002935137,0.001505442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986184,0.00004502662,0.0009088669,0.00000577848,0.000001396248,0.00001216987,0.0002373676,0.000002634853,0.0001683417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02560059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05090314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0767170646625442,"score_gpt":0.3494730676597297,"score_spread":0.2727560029971856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}