{"id":"W4293568975","doi":"10.1111/ecog.06287","title":"A protocol for reproducible functional diversity analyses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Mitacs; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Akademie Věd České Republiky; European Commission","keywords":"Protocol (science); Computer science; Metadata; Comparability; Data science; Workflow; Ecology; Checklist; Trait; Transparency (behavior); Diversity (politics); Data mining; Biology; Database; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0591307,0.00186434,0.001999161,0.005215042,0.004497931,0.004355077,0.003797093,0.004071642,0.2172185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1230508,0.002497037,0.002267995,0.003892417,0.002986117,0.002907209,0.00544844,0.006183266,0.09140338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002771726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01726953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002316368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004418701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9565591,0.01908492,0.009312333,0.004548647,0.008666937,0.001828094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8488104,0.04862897,0.004304546,0.04395174,0.05166872,0.002635581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002360229,0.0008238303,0.002319172,0.006961514,0.0001370568,0.001252976,0.007372544,0.001507874,0.01997788,0.03511585,0.7407773,0.1813938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004210199,0.0004472057,0.002559543,0.002201679,0.00004483683,0.0003190094,0.0008371344,0.0009410328,0.006476241,0.01531083,0.9702442,0.0001974057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008326444,0.0009217206,0.5814404,0.004425014,0.004531923,0.2317086,0.09539765,0.01863365,0.0546147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008361749,0.0005468992,0.3338682,0.002407342,0.0003356423,0.5906059,0.02910793,0.003297733,0.03146862],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7266684,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1897999159361005,"score_gpt":0.3461755552759557,"score_spread":0.1563756393398553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}