{"id":"W4294234185","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6454","title":"The Making Research Accessible Initiative: A Case Study in Community Engagement and Collaboration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual framework; Relevance (law); Community engagement; Knowledge management; Reciprocal; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Process (computing); Community development; Conceptual model; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01987175,0.0006998902,0.00100708,0.002428191,0.03374371,0.01034627,0.003837169,0.009607015,0.003897117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02987068,0.0006023636,0.001203254,0.004643783,0.01711898,0.0104495,0.0164269,0.007409611,0.0008014239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00699497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009443361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006301937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01605292,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9617013,0.03168894,0.0006168665,0.0010505,0.002098792,0.002843599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9645903,0.02239652,0.001757556,0.00205673,0.001404948,0.007793876],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001794632,0.001367968,0.006028289,0.000336377,0.00002559511,0.02672196,0.8851278,0.0004105474,0.0009063871,0.04229455,0.005744589,0.03085646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006412251,0.0004623862,0.001999438,0.0003299732,0.00002911163,0.006899841,0.8685049,0.00078835,0.001235732,0.01323634,0.1063813,0.00006847086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8825601,0.001714033,0.01735763,0.03772634,0.0003424725,0.001078367,0.0001362104,0.0001762695,0.05890861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748954,0.001326421,0.0108499,0.003578912,0.0001301842,0.0006506387,0.00005519037,0.0000827337,0.008430717],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1050931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2781124655644645,"score_gpt":0.4224017543092287,"score_spread":0.1442892887447642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}