{"id":"W4294234185","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6454","title":"The Making Research Accessible Initiative: A Case Study in Community Engagement and Collaboration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual framework; Relevance (law); Community engagement; Knowledge management; Reciprocal; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Process (computing); Community development; Conceptual model; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02651435,0.00005587203,0.00007695504,0.0008034228,0.008969015,0.001635812,0.0002764326,0.00003685359,0.00002164429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001821675,0.00003717934,0.000006898806,0.001813731,0.0004495774,0.01289877,0.0005132381,0.002253425,0.000001120413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005349751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006320546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001159897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002642838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968926,0.002116981,0.0003189816,0.00005124091,0.000384727,0.0002354369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978172,0.001485502,0.0002202179,0.0001027375,0.0003529792,0.00002139193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004282034,0.0001130869,0.09101979,0.0001200962,0.00009705341,0.000479431,0.1431898,0.00002709753,9.293953e-7,0.7319236,0.01182487,0.02077613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003137481,0.00009543075,0.01193809,0.00001434519,0.000005739089,0.0001398047,0.7009128,0.0001598173,0.000002167687,0.006317931,0.2800541,0.00004598929],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9079592,0.0003924479,0.000002667254,0.06078883,0.00006018412,0.0005151086,0.000001239009,0.000004604133,0.03027571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978423,0.00009740543,0.00002851426,0.001851956,0.00006130992,0.00005333792,0.000002864841,0.000003754341,0.00005862458],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7256056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2781124655644645,"score_gpt":0.4224017543092287,"score_spread":0.1442892887447642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}