{"id":"W4294343535","doi":"10.1007/s11896-022-09544-4","title":"Sketching: The Effect of a Dual-Modality Technique on Recall Performance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Recall; Narrative; Recall test; Modality effect; Modality (human–computer interaction); Free recall; Presentation (obstetrics); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Cognition; Short-term memory; Medicine; Working memory","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001016258,0.0009223652,0.0007144473,0.0005909943,0.0001881939,0.00156505,0.0008615071,0.001424109,0.01171379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02565879,0.0003494842,0.0004382507,0.0004008976,0.0004236658,0.001360437,0.0008374271,0.001071666,0.001180238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001451028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003299731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005805547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004110405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992282,0.0001605553,0.00009005862,0.0002276636,0.0002248686,0.00006859464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765174,0.01957848,0.001278014,0.001594454,0.0003683614,0.000663294],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07058292,0.004318084,0.008311411,0.001049942,0.0004539473,0.0002446914,0.001414726,0.001586676,0.6386389,0.0006870421,0.0008129601,0.2718988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008613887,0.09910364,0.2617293,0.0005348987,0.003480005,0.004895223,0.002099552,0.04008291,0.561457,0.006581158,0.0107768,0.000645685],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990126,0.0007460229,0.005957359,0.00007335122,0.0001157918,0.0000800624,0.0001595479,0.0003492526,0.002392619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878567,0.0005001992,0.007575943,0.00008536167,0.00007885183,0.00007212522,0.0001654389,0.0001398269,0.003525427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01171379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0391866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03585876651379795,"score_gpt":0.4017479556136974,"score_spread":0.3658891890998995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}