{"id":"W4295539916","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15090406","title":"Mapping the Trend, Application and Forecasting Performance of Asymmetric GARCH Models: A Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliographic coupling; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Leverage (statistics); Computer science; Volatility (finance); Citation; Data science; Econometrics; Political science; Economics; Library science; Artificial intelligence; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005093464,0.001024444,0.00234608,0.0331325,0.0004752299,0.002555516,0.001101868,0.0009865618,0.002036156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02133157,0.0005828153,0.002356958,0.03413753,0.0005788234,0.0028219,0.0008077833,0.0006600963,0.0004009563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001663981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006023224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004478097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006792901,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972302,0.0006945153,0.0007682688,0.0002648599,0.0009599564,0.0000821272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808914,0.01384963,0.002440389,0.0002962905,0.002353583,0.0001686962],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008439349,0.00005583173,0.004615821,0.2139279,0.002052046,0.0001917941,0.0004413177,0.001347481,0.000614167,0.002859973,0.007845115,0.7659643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008651304,0.0005873881,0.05315153,0.3776149,0.02856131,0.002528378,0.001973679,0.004633404,0.00252739,0.01013096,0.5178988,0.0003057047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001761579,0.995726,0.0006799082,0.0005421343,0.000113038,0.0000401494,0.0002146745,0.00002048932,0.0009020891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009118713,0.9896974,0.0006990454,0.0001110115,0.00009597663,0.00003624904,0.0001372986,0.000004178695,0.0001001488],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02693719,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.112061827117271,"score_gpt":0.273140972616864,"score_spread":0.161079145499593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}