{"id":"W4295539916","doi":"10.3390/jrfm15090406","title":"Mapping the Trend, Application and Forecasting Performance of Asymmetric GARCH Models: A Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Bibliographic coupling; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Leverage (statistics); Computer science; Volatility (finance); Citation; Data science; Econometrics; Political science; Economics; Library science; Artificial intelligence; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005049093,0.0003211901,0.002302505,0.04040098,0.000302042,0.00005305733,0.0004377533,0.0001140939,0.00001543337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004285344,0.0002556914,0.000779016,0.05807195,0.00005330125,0.000162573,0.000190265,0.0006545631,0.000001492693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001319741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004573627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006894051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007002798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966218,0.0001133321,0.002318994,0.0004336198,0.0002464162,0.0002658118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951919,0.0005193703,0.003738849,0.0004160636,0.00006310425,0.00007076187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001920032,0.00006251453,0.001353237,0.01086894,0.0001480152,0.00000237462,0.00005014939,0.001244032,7.390173e-10,0.002066438,0.00003556594,0.9841495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003721799,0.000247581,0.005193684,0.004451775,0.001709719,0.000006449784,0.00002424906,0.09742347,1.252491e-8,0.001364565,0.8888698,0.0003365416],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005040864,0.9322138,0.06556416,0.00001509987,0.00011826,0.000581131,0.0001220522,0.000004680394,0.0008767107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01601454,0.9826025,0.001110959,0.00005604281,0.00008624163,0.0000673911,0.0000186708,0.00002438563,0.0000192466],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.983813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.112061827117271,"score_gpt":0.273140972616864,"score_spread":0.161079145499593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}