{"id":"W4296087429","doi":"10.3390/f13091437","title":"A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Research Progress and Trends on Decay and Cavity Trees in Forest Ecosystem over 20 Years: An Application of the CiteSpace Software","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forests","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Web of science; Field (mathematics); Geography; Endangered species; Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Data science; Ecology; Library science; Ecosystem; Political science; Computer science; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009231007,0.001353931,0.002977932,0.2477221,0.001539049,0.005863265,0.001041885,0.0008407804,0.007457279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03224793,0.0004324655,0.00290997,0.2687637,0.0007321007,0.00555068,0.003394094,0.0008524078,0.001299547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002413361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005643928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008102532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01179193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913147,0.001276784,0.002965023,0.0009941505,0.00309593,0.0003534315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960897,0.02122844,0.008665273,0.001193935,0.006907349,0.00110789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000698259,0.0003440013,0.3024683,0.1143825,0.004722558,0.002663557,0.01696365,0.005203196,0.007887675,0.01079949,0.07870135,0.4551654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001479316,0.0004567313,0.7117072,0.01107258,0.005117825,0.002537246,0.0134028,0.009617965,0.00312845,0.007250794,0.2351009,0.000459639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3620469,0.06714731,0.01319742,0.002825391,0.0006474669,0.003000405,0.5118338,0.005265227,0.03403609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6115956,0.06010355,0.07781298,0.0003813864,0.0008038708,0.005925263,0.2355241,0.0005608298,0.007292367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7522779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04881877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0356243670982706,"score_gpt":0.325236683622932,"score_spread":0.2896123165246614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}