{"id":"W4296606915","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2022.102797","title":"COPs and ‘robbers?’ Better understanding community energy and toward a Communities of Place then Interest approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Research & Social Science","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan; Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Popularity; CLARITY; Sociology; Unpacking; Public relations; Wright; Energy (signal processing); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003235534,0.0005301042,0.0005695223,0.002251282,0.005674829,0.006707249,0.002358357,0.004345218,0.01310422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005908481,0.00028906,0.0004731739,0.002171404,0.03512154,0.01986532,0.005872725,0.003219266,0.0006304123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003314311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002732097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01654099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02001281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974002,0.001589157,0.00003333545,0.0003367004,0.0003012996,0.0003394497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962497,0.001873005,0.0004169545,0.00045598,0.0004646858,0.0005395925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005496724,0.00002065082,0.0006970962,0.00003397187,0.000005705439,0.00004504106,0.01913021,0.0001833398,0.00005093565,0.9714453,0.002050082,0.006332151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007321826,0.000009429544,0.00135205,0.00008397851,0.000005433756,0.00006705651,0.03847655,0.000956202,0.00006032464,0.901264,0.05770577,0.0000118733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2013642,0.005574577,0.1099109,0.1565445,0.0009003133,0.00009375058,0.0001020323,0.00009385981,0.525416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860389,0.0005645303,0.003733444,0.001843647,0.0001312999,0.00004392181,0.00002351326,0.0000381711,0.007582486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01654099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04383802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2676495357150721,"score_gpt":0.3916093318369698,"score_spread":0.1239597961218977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}