{"id":"W4297018400","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ac9490","title":"Is crushed concrete carbonation significant enough to be considered as a carbon mitigation strategy?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Carbonation; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Carbon sequestration; Crushed stone; Carbon fibers; Carbonatation; Climate change; Cement; Carbon dioxide; Civil engineering; Production (economics); Materials science; Engineering; Geology; Chemistry; Metallurgy; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005281408,0.0002138062,0.0001836076,0.0002726328,0.0003014561,0.00007531712,0.0003211979,0.00005190166,0.001200316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000371132,0.000257852,0.00006060272,0.0003254336,0.0001721569,0.0001677751,0.0002102056,0.0006993697,0.000130525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003827005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000190407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002905675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969926,0.0002511991,0.000294046,0.0004284305,0.001367786,0.0006659771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991847,0.0001549351,0.0000356923,0.0003813426,0.000008898019,0.0002344543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004612901,0.000005586776,0.000618835,0.00001695774,0.00004509444,0.00009000745,0.001793374,0.01722892,0.9758224,0.00002707007,0.002958456,0.001347192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001911613,0.0008257135,0.01184502,0.00004497317,0.00002733647,0.00006694992,0.005123517,0.1214662,0.8127758,0.0001403917,0.04456784,0.00120459],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892792,0.0002080731,0.00001072867,0.007143048,0.0001568941,0.0008389321,0.00009828158,0.0001155603,0.002149253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976401,0.00008790443,0.000113893,0.00121934,0.0000801935,0.0004419741,0.0001023047,0.00006864618,0.0002456747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1630466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03250892472776502,"score_gpt":0.2719432873264792,"score_spread":0.2394343625987142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}