{"id":"W4297140955","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107081","title":"A systematic literature review of the Design Critique method","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information and Software Technology","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; Thematic analysis; Process (computing); Agile software development; Context (archaeology); Coding (social sciences); Systematic review; Data science; Data collection; Domain (mathematical analysis); Management science; Software engineering; Qualitative research; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000921514,0.00009133566,0.0002183383,0.0004662507,0.0002270533,0.00003069697,0.0008087163,0.00009918131,0.00001515462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00105351,0.00006616968,0.00003939663,0.001644184,0.00006854122,0.0006922249,0.0005590043,0.0004515967,0.000004637648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000573516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005086191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.130931e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.290719e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988922,0.0002303201,0.0004860819,0.0001018132,0.0001795211,0.0001100016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986025,0.0001371476,0.0004191551,0.0005198375,0.0003128856,0.000008445654],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004464728,0.00002809827,0.00006877001,0.04077011,0.00004674882,0.000004702669,0.00165108,0.00002766027,0.0001188843,0.9243723,0.004085182,0.028822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003227181,0.002505926,0.0007931747,0.2543016,0.0002769101,0.02269593,0.004806824,0.05115921,0.04941062,0.4966266,0.1117151,0.002480882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001133388,0.006571206,0.9859856,0.005860521,0.0002109205,0.0007008556,0.000005092871,0.0004317572,0.0001207133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09734701,0.005530858,0.8639935,0.03020479,0.00001617911,0.002581806,0.00002498234,0.00002201738,0.0002789034],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4277457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2698321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009511806529675343,"score_gpt":0.2801530657174474,"score_spread":0.270641259187772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}