{"id":"W4297140955","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107081","title":"A systematic literature review of the Design Critique method","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information and Software Technology","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; Thematic analysis; Process (computing); Agile software development; Context (archaeology); Coding (social sciences); Systematic review; Data science; Data collection; Domain (mathematical analysis); Management science; Software engineering; Qualitative research; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1899098,0.004061748,0.01464736,0.05731569,0.004738361,0.009482766,0.006380704,0.006870836,0.008249016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3538489,0.003137367,0.01389398,0.0240975,0.00520469,0.006704377,0.007193481,0.003123935,0.001196515],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02018815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07549663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008233629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02553382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6884727,0.1774696,0.08813947,0.01170059,0.03193529,0.002282288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6830376,0.2311562,0.03748532,0.01010292,0.03606685,0.002151153],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004734593,0.00007335695,0.001160137,0.9187503,0.009414813,0.000286006,0.002267323,0.0002404286,0.0005195881,0.001579075,0.003658614,0.06157678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001558699,0.0004806794,0.001847705,0.9196091,0.04123868,0.0003379217,0.001599913,0.0002573559,0.0006238258,0.002380326,0.02991029,0.0001554451],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006668275,0.8759301,0.02376896,0.005458385,0.00256053,0.07830711,0.003850284,0.0002196249,0.003236757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09376086,0.5276181,0.1272642,0.01075932,0.000908875,0.2345062,0.002529393,0.0001766649,0.002476479],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1899098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009511806529675343,"score_gpt":0.2801530657174474,"score_spread":0.270641259187772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}