{"id":"W4297828007","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/nmbr9","title":"Examining the Effects of Evidence Disclosure Timing and Strength on Information Inconsistencies and Provision within Investigative Interviews","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Statement (logic); Psychology; Deception; Empirical evidence; Interview; Trustworthiness; Reliability (semiconductor); Affect (linguistics); Self-disclosure; Social psychology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03546212,0.0007430065,0.0005668965,0.0009373785,0.0009108767,0.002625503,0.001163599,0.001141493,0.004235003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2724245,0.0009759022,0.0005046697,0.0007835373,0.00142683,0.002278018,0.002668171,0.001840579,0.0003289052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009409434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001476967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004361442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007284106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9590785,0.02735349,0.005325851,0.00289163,0.004136424,0.001214149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3673303,0.5405989,0.06580753,0.01436186,0.007882524,0.004018884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07678981,0.02064511,0.3268212,0.00613294,0.001337976,0.001268185,0.07503044,0.00712439,0.2218355,0.006648849,0.0009531769,0.2554125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003522941,0.04824566,0.8413068,0.001026109,0.001674277,0.0009766916,0.01639297,0.006491493,0.06832273,0.006286145,0.005313043,0.0004411001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954366,0.0001618311,0.002521017,0.0001177921,0.00003134132,0.0003527524,0.00006352028,0.0000215558,0.001293562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876652,0.0001431177,0.01041214,0.00008380477,0.00004046691,0.001097727,0.0000745122,0.00002172561,0.0004612585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03546212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1875439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1619355540242687,"score_gpt":0.3600149092542618,"score_spread":0.1980793552299931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}