{"id":"W4298120925","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1501.06603","title":"Proximal point algorithm, Douglas-Rachford algorithm and alternating\\n projections: a case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Optimization and Variational Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Iterated function; Algorithm; Epigraph; Convergence (economics); Rate of convergence; Convex function; Mathematics; Euclidean geometry; Regular polygon; Constraint (computer-aided design); Computer science; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002979794,0.0008079553,0.000838755,0.000952071,0.0008254868,0.001333503,0.0009544797,0.002600562,0.00236686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008247377,0.0003733042,0.0009254964,0.001981543,0.002343675,0.001846335,0.001634676,0.002154033,0.0003932431],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007632523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009379458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003465952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002467539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983757,0.0009948242,0.00006250153,0.0001576479,0.0002981127,0.0001112706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967132,0.002382175,0.0002342308,0.0001835555,0.0003135592,0.0001734081],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001555763,0.0001198681,0.001659352,0.0003020856,0.00005485158,0.0007889492,0.0003358992,0.4222356,0.00137677,0.5219828,0.003433975,0.0475542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003239428,0.0001196439,0.0004110623,0.00003338258,0.00001919034,0.0003865092,0.000104421,0.9192507,0.0009864442,0.07409115,0.004541574,0.00002343871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04295851,0.003541843,0.9354442,0.001136977,0.00007913023,0.00008706923,0.00006309641,0.0001225193,0.01656661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5556619,0.004377414,0.4275745,0.0001416355,0.0001878889,0.0002372088,0.000125473,0.0001051425,0.01158884],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003465952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01575887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0782538518003712,"score_gpt":0.223788466590379,"score_spread":0.1455346147900078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}