{"id":"W4298240765","doi":"10.46298/jpe.10564","title":"Classifying Heterodoxy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of Philosophical Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Heterodoxy; Heterodox economics; Scholarship; Positive economics; Discipline; Economics; Epistemology; Mainstream economics; Neoclassical economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Orthodoxy; Applied economics; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01127353,0.001017977,0.0009492859,0.007381255,0.01125704,0.01436708,0.001519953,0.004080926,0.008041197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02205699,0.0004051895,0.0007070279,0.006155783,0.03103662,0.01757732,0.00961213,0.005981767,0.001617344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006581187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003389096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00208472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001496715,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847807,0.007458207,0.0005711151,0.002051662,0.003494746,0.0016436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872873,0.006022511,0.001367551,0.002147202,0.002310013,0.0008653825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001098341,0.000006597486,0.0004967311,0.00002654576,0.000002722354,0.00005284615,0.009706519,0.00003606332,0.00005653998,0.9776419,0.002629348,0.009333164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001040132,0.00002411631,0.0007127461,0.0003372192,0.00000899325,0.000250948,0.01436092,0.000419458,0.0002462988,0.6782344,0.3053791,0.00001536488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06326592,0.0170204,0.0715731,0.03239769,0.003709072,0.0002640035,0.0001734529,0.0001672047,0.8114292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030114,0.008624276,0.02073747,0.00994972,0.002526484,0.0004670523,0.0003673923,0.0003240572,0.05399216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01436708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05962086,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0777712372618511,"score_gpt":0.22878963543066,"score_spread":0.1510183981688089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}