{"id":"W4298860546","doi":"","title":"Ophthalmology on social networking sites: an observational study of Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Social media; Internet privacy; Cyberpsychology; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":3,"stratum":"about_only","weight":3321.24,"opus":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Observational study of the social media presence and reach of ophthalmology journals, associations and publications; the object is scholarly and professional dissemination practice."},"gpt":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"It studies how ophthalmology journals and professional organizations use social media for scholarly dissemination."},"grok":{"tier":"T1","genre":"empirical","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Observational study of ophthalmology journals and associations on social platforms; object is scholarly communication."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002139691,0.0003534669,0.0007655822,0.001800084,0.001452267,0.002145512,0.0009207658,0.001400765,0.002803353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01384739,0.0007072661,0.000780447,0.004696744,0.0005709001,0.004171827,0.002150835,0.002011715,0.0007769417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007273098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007775935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01164281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996932,0.001003999,0.0004628475,0.000383046,0.0007735916,0.000444423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853439,0.003812752,0.007381009,0.000610469,0.001077669,0.001774203],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007508041,0.00013909,0.9968172,0.00005479867,0.00006149773,0.0000986029,0.001017102,0.000009522281,0.00003336859,0.00004220338,0.0004848503,0.001166774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002025828,0.0002116524,0.9893461,0.0001277136,0.00006515572,0.0003992292,0.008123935,0.0002715585,0.00003186761,0.00006721834,0.001311492,0.0000239724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968989,0.0006575523,0.00006911772,0.0002414729,0.00001865811,0.00005440801,0.001060914,0.000003600829,0.0009954319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977568,0.0006234224,0.0001199754,0.0001776876,0.00004038277,0.00008072161,0.0008640963,0.000008412179,0.0003283433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01164281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9201899723697708,"score_gpt":0.7080092600878297,"score_spread":0.2121807122819411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}