{"id":"W4299532132","doi":"","title":"Quality of Online Chat Reference Answers Differ between Local and Consortium Library Staff: Providing Consortium Staff with More Local Information Can Mitigate these Differences. A Review of: Meert, D.L., & Given, L.M. (2009). Measuring quality in chat reference consortia: A comparative analysis of responses to users’ queries.” College & Research Libraries, 70(1), 71‐84.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Library science; Medical education; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Medicine; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06304282,0.0002862372,0.0005976557,0.002912693,0.002872633,0.005816746,0.001375712,0.001125844,0.006172937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2528608,0.0004129758,0.0005539345,0.003787614,0.002214892,0.005178126,0.005199912,0.0009347301,0.001693488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003599943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006291056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01229466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03079752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9319971,0.04698958,0.004793069,0.002405732,0.01138331,0.002431056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7950528,0.1281956,0.02053274,0.007368398,0.04450626,0.004344263],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009182171,0.0003324737,0.3327864,0.002584267,0.0002118873,0.0004359615,0.3291422,0.0001573392,0.0035865,0.002111783,0.01535129,0.3123817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001184134,0.0007451811,0.645491,0.002306983,0.0001978214,0.0003586096,0.3011886,0.0009493387,0.003899511,0.0022028,0.0423585,0.0001832294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641778,0.001961882,0.006569943,0.006376527,0.0002468886,0.0004311175,0.0004375321,0.000245987,0.01955236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914397,0.0006157506,0.003092511,0.001607182,0.00008391999,0.0004579845,0.00032125,0.0000881322,0.002293533],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3334063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4844060976734669,"score_gpt":0.5750447996685754,"score_spread":0.09063870199510843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}