{"id":"W4300293483","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1708.04706","title":"On Error-Correction Performance and Implementation of Polar Code List\\n Decoders for 5G","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decoding methods; Computer science; Low-density parity-check code; Polar code; Error detection and correction; Polar; Energy consumption; Computer engineering; Algorithm; Implementation; Throughput; Code (set theory); Latency (audio); Efficient energy use; Wireless; Set (abstract data type); Telecommunications; Electrical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019536,0.0006069037,0.0006565935,0.0006498109,0.0009586678,0.000223153,0.001964648,0.0004487993,0.00002596457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001764701,0.000787476,0.0003182933,0.0003634852,0.0003436957,0.001115407,0.0007903984,0.0006986245,0.000008953694],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004938208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003961804,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001734049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001510698,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966063,0.0001882093,0.0005537429,0.001849455,0.0001951084,0.0006072166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951794,0.0004283996,0.001690161,0.001913767,0.0005859706,0.000202284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003131632,0.001247679,0.3871764,0.004831399,0.001275549,0.0001300178,0.01480665,0.2349848,0.002347821,0.1154691,0.008208961,0.22639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001455518,0.001526739,0.01732417,0.0007136397,0.0002420423,0.00001703274,0.0006015191,0.9501393,0.0151636,0.01129319,0.0005113751,0.001011836],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6235356,0.00002777257,0.3720526,0.00007460797,0.002030181,0.001067419,0.00004323353,0.000198383,0.0009701865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953667,0.0006321727,0.002679795,0.00005578507,0.00007363185,0.000008483289,0.00002585851,0.00004719882,0.001110406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7151546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08010558887652235,"score_gpt":0.2593271710160379,"score_spread":0.1792215821395155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}