{"id":"W4301201745","doi":"10.1051/agro:2007043/pdf","title":"Ex ante Assessment of the Sustainability of Alternative Cropping Systems: Implications for Using Multi-criteria Decision-Aid Methods - A Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Sustainability; Cropping; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Management science; Environmental economics; Engineering; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Biology; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00620035,0.0001624707,0.0004176893,0.00005059136,0.0004242246,0.0000343764,0.0008436216,0.00005618883,0.00006954507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003377085,0.0001137206,0.0002633517,0.0009442989,0.0003563619,0.0002076693,0.0005528832,0.0001006718,9.644098e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005680114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001218406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007829894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003140038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940352,0.004253697,0.0007616188,0.0004079255,0.0003045403,0.0002370062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945195,0.001625764,0.0008378998,0.001256545,0.001681149,0.00007917615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004405099,0.003544973,0.577976,0.006280553,0.00071772,0.000004500539,0.01802786,0.01339602,0.2668578,0.05336105,0.002658094,0.05713133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001637576,0.000003259494,0.6569305,0.007606831,0.0004203728,0.00008273036,0.002575846,0.284596,0.03059516,0.002401658,0.01236983,0.0007802546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2679825,0.001465578,0.7266279,0.001530122,0.00005640264,0.001368424,0.00003321503,0.00002053975,0.0009154059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8045484,0.0002720318,0.1942611,0.00002565685,0.00000484752,0.00009739754,0.0000124599,0.00001192877,0.0007661678],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.536566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03691156702825213,"score_gpt":0.3494830564027347,"score_spread":0.3125714893744825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}