{"id":"W4301322000","doi":"10.51758/agjsr-04-2014-0028","title":"Comparative Study of the Environmental Impact Assessment System in the State of Kuwait with International Best Practice using Gap Analysis Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Business; Impact assessment; Best practice; Environmental resource management; Recreation; Gap analysis (conservation); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental protection; Political science; Environmental science; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009672409,0.0002623484,0.0004351215,0.008290305,0.002410305,0.005782535,0.0009614803,0.0007525234,0.002667439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02152731,0.0003093109,0.0003378849,0.01164889,0.002213765,0.003414166,0.00307494,0.0005342578,0.0002105747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01035563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00948208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03725643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04218761,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988998,0.005801639,0.0009500614,0.0005678032,0.002553803,0.001128704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98514,0.005745881,0.001955113,0.001049091,0.005511581,0.0005983259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000667893,0.001172743,0.3925053,0.002304483,0.0004470868,0.002243567,0.1258868,0.02582372,0.002983734,0.1444941,0.005768827,0.2957015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006147008,0.0008377433,0.5425369,0.001324611,0.0002971265,0.0006726092,0.3577107,0.03364599,0.002618713,0.01283349,0.04729957,0.0001610182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632792,0.0004370577,0.00363311,0.001112767,0.00002281042,0.0002188685,0.0002655121,0.00006252569,0.03096803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961648,0.0001798937,0.002637782,0.00004430016,0.000003974839,0.00007936922,0.0001324586,0.000007476694,0.0007500366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03725643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07513577,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09728568623439844,"score_gpt":0.4307442992492392,"score_spread":0.3334586130148408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}