{"id":"W4301730437","doi":"","title":"Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: a health economic literature review.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Gynecological conditions and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Tubal ligation; Sterilization (economics); Activity-based costing; Cost effectiveness; Hysteroscopy; Cost–benefit analysis; Laparoscopy; Health care; Family planning; Gynecology; Obstetrics; Surgery; Population; Research methodology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental health; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878376,0.001533627,0.005048527,0.01961524,0.0005527204,0.002618195,0.001540374,0.001819695,0.007567183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02514122,0.0007564483,0.004579089,0.02155059,0.0006225342,0.001895979,0.001236711,0.001265787,0.0004855088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005402989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008980663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007789527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0152276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959887,0.001332669,0.001175485,0.0002155085,0.001108271,0.0001794627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832649,0.01048949,0.004081176,0.0001276002,0.001801561,0.0002353032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003701875,0.00006946038,0.001515676,0.8086816,0.004956974,0.0002913399,0.00009465541,0.0002994137,0.00009753407,0.0006900359,0.009019756,0.1739133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004201722,0.0003181937,0.01014204,0.8985143,0.03468789,0.001326162,0.0003707693,0.0003720259,0.0001737931,0.001028701,0.05258983,0.00005608935],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003528272,0.9986776,0.00003275454,0.0003288498,0.00004590239,0.00007664313,0.0001945717,0.000002532671,0.0002882395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005658397,0.9932867,0.0002471572,0.0003427793,0.00006587995,0.0001566728,0.0001834952,0.000001947238,0.00005708149],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01961524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03920156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08342359880438358,"score_gpt":0.3611817783101862,"score_spread":0.2777581795058026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}