{"id":"W4302303809","doi":"10.4153/s0008439522000595","title":"On the greatest common divisor of <i>n</i> and the <i>n</i>th Fibonacci number, II","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Mathematical Bulletin","topic":"Analytic Number Theory Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fibonacci number; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Integer (computer science); Sequence (biology); Greatest common divisor; Upper and lower bounds; Natural number; Least common multiple; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002747678,0.0002298857,0.0005004232,0.00007371545,0.001093732,0.00005186342,0.0008489558,0.00005703264,0.03698288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002117876,0.0001324289,0.0001424365,0.0003206116,0.0008370518,0.00001454589,0.000468508,0.0006586683,0.0007905307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001419198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001707105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001608306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007140489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997321,0.0007072079,0.0004907059,0.0002703493,0.0006714367,0.0005392775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906526,0.007942382,0.0001520405,0.0008692264,0.00006483956,0.0003189724],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006698187,0.00008823743,0.00007596612,0.00006516596,0.00005675272,0.00001947959,0.0008541626,0.00000248135,0.000002996089,0.8878248,0.110764,0.0001788795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008552686,0.00009842544,0.00001541566,0.00005485699,0.00006816097,0.000104078,0.001101162,0.0006437574,0.00004692291,0.9512734,0.04556182,0.0001767544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6544114,0.00009858692,0.0001612221,0.08913153,0.00007250617,0.001900103,0.0002396862,0.00006527455,0.2539197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844731,0.000006019967,0.0001816973,0.002533895,0.00003366016,0.0002298152,0.00000490073,0.00005192094,0.01248499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3300617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03046004986734503,"score_gpt":0.2796084533168295,"score_spread":0.2491484034494845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}