{"id":"W4303199478","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1279","title":"PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Concordia University; Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Radicalization; Protocol (science); Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Terrorism; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2201345,0.005743443,0.01628736,0.0149481,0.005432907,0.01095494,0.005591147,0.01344494,0.09818128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4116319,0.007271904,0.01643207,0.01521392,0.008567119,0.0119391,0.007910872,0.0134227,0.02341469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01868311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08451452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006350543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01025606,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8183711,0.09261533,0.0572734,0.009322784,0.01889785,0.003519583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7227066,0.1223852,0.04384365,0.02733996,0.07705565,0.006669004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006581497,0.0002317155,0.001006578,0.7838901,0.003678618,0.0003667411,0.004353273,0.001139824,0.00151759,0.01256704,0.1234492,0.06121781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03850481,0.001289497,0.004251107,0.6647625,0.008227479,0.0004820221,0.002588711,0.002250833,0.00287452,0.03358088,0.2402543,0.000933395],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004486616,0.002634306,0.004043573,0.003070954,0.001801464,0.9758316,0.0106065,0.0003340532,0.001228904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005261756,0.0007341522,0.006411568,0.0005165928,0.00008928105,0.990635,0.0006407548,0.00002826668,0.0004181272],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2201345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.961713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3908457993396475,"score_gpt":0.4714828810098572,"score_spread":0.08063708167020972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}