{"id":"W4303199478","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1279","title":"PROTOCOL: Are tools that assess risk of violent radicalization fit for purpose? A systematic review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Concordia University; Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Radicalization; Protocol (science); Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Terrorism; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02369265,0.001211116,0.01674663,0.0002812138,0.0006958112,0.000270791,0.002571651,0.0005712234,0.0005742051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02689495,0.0007824056,0.003947695,0.001144992,0.0002579795,0.000375264,0.000218646,0.0006682453,0.0002260294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001064062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008518113,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008628051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004048045,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9656545,0.02246223,0.00789417,0.001088625,0.001921578,0.0009788778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745389,0.006682299,0.01557445,0.002386527,0.000348052,0.0004697799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001860537,0.0001094378,0.000001546064,0.9816788,0.0002411213,0.00000416538,0.001524114,8.813662e-8,5.152986e-9,0.0003110046,0.002400509,0.01372733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009436808,0.00004998991,5.295016e-8,0.5177916,0.006070044,0.00001173235,0.001892757,0.000005954594,3.256365e-8,0.00003656553,0.4736443,0.0004026085],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[4.749023e-8,0.5983529,0.00210175,0.00001979101,0.0005125215,0.3984685,0.0002427097,0.0000687014,0.0002330286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002218697,0.5571824,0.00003120897,0.0001439546,0.0001770293,0.4417947,0.00006543072,0.00007654554,0.0005265347],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4712438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3908457993396475,"score_gpt":0.4714828810098572,"score_spread":0.08063708167020972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}