{"id":"W430380211","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1450","title":"Mediating Ethically: The Limits of Codes of Conduct and the Potential of a Reflective Practice Model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Impartiality; Mediation; Scope (computer science); Process (computing); Conceptual model; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Ethical code; Intervention (counseling); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.199325,0.001658454,0.002018214,0.004923779,0.01282525,0.03353228,0.00762508,0.01619129,0.003581189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2160937,0.001621832,0.001624102,0.002989311,0.1625188,0.04712382,0.01964374,0.01488791,0.0009144708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01138579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02452645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002904533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001870557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7154275,0.2512195,0.004894799,0.006240443,0.01816187,0.004055869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6568508,0.2895878,0.007918297,0.03018171,0.009653846,0.005807593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009947377,0.00002215023,0.0001297257,0.00003931316,0.000006366734,0.00006123965,0.008203887,0.000469795,0.00002482777,0.9868317,0.0003374218,0.003863701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002544825,0.00001886256,0.00003530415,0.0001411809,0.000005521512,0.00006301909,0.001753764,0.001698467,0.00005271013,0.9890724,0.007120329,0.00001304295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02521162,0.004219968,0.622577,0.1382506,0.001051986,0.0008345662,0.00005160895,0.0002881013,0.2075146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7416908,0.00178144,0.2407903,0.004718969,0.0005266715,0.003176393,0.00003660045,0.0001281077,0.007150637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.199325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08897589654760271,"score_gpt":0.3600494271194001,"score_spread":0.2710735305717974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}