{"id":"W4304145111","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04537-w","title":"Global impact or national accessibility? A paradox in China’s science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Political science; Visibility; International community; Scientific communication; Scientific publishing; Regional science; Sociology; Library science; Geography; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1443928,0.0002769826,0.0004816832,0.2889733,0.001699303,0.006375298,0.01170063,0.00007597594,0.005159388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2127716,0.0001858966,0.0002607784,0.8949101,0.001019991,0.002619047,0.006489086,0.0005828656,0.0002156633],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006556989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008900182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005062098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008292424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9300591,0.0005314,0.001337947,0.002253839,0.06387719,0.001940533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861471,0.003779169,0.0006108497,0.001652187,0.006363311,0.001447374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011616,0.0007568265,0.9146708,0.000002861731,0.000005475771,0.0000531535,0.0002005591,0.005458027,0.0001011227,0.002572758,0.01019749,0.06586476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007811029,0.000373562,0.9523097,0.000001879122,0.000001644242,0.00005336546,0.0003295117,0.02455364,0.00003792662,0.01515985,0.006125957,0.0002718536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677801,0.0004457613,0.001027085,0.0006666144,0.001792452,0.0005107301,0.000438831,0.00004926662,0.02728922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970747,0.00002347767,0.0008977509,0.0002175119,0.00005873026,0.00005144199,0.000006821107,0.00001004687,0.00165947],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6059368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6015316297703749,"score_gpt":0.6593529174440662,"score_spread":0.05782128767369132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}