{"id":"W4306846252","doi":"10.1007/s10849-022-09375-w","title":"Deontic Paradoxes in Mīmāṃsā Logics: There and Back Again","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Logic Language and Information","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Austrian Science Fund; Vienna Science and Technology Fund","keywords":"Deontic logic; Philosophy; Epistemology; Vedas; Sanskrit; Focus (optics); Normative; Modal; Field (mathematics); Treasure; Linguistics; Computer science; Calculus (dental); Sociology; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Theology; Hinduism; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005721394,0.0003993599,0.000675377,0.001864527,0.005002441,0.008411594,0.00115904,0.002241052,0.002920788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009661056,0.0004497915,0.0007121955,0.001402493,0.01654514,0.0135954,0.005160815,0.004435473,0.0002737958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004494738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001936703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001859325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002658229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996572,0.002053638,0.0002082915,0.0003594952,0.000627247,0.0001792796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929745,0.004802036,0.0006642288,0.0007641946,0.0005544533,0.0002405792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009598471,0.000005149729,0.0001019806,0.00001566926,0.000003794479,0.00004152707,0.0007694574,0.0001815006,0.00008297303,0.996828,0.0001896656,0.001770784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001035045,0.00001022266,0.0001692989,0.00003910818,0.000005926681,0.00009043855,0.0009679609,0.002548706,0.0002797964,0.9905906,0.005274943,0.00001252627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4082401,0.01705563,0.249346,0.04873313,0.001011355,0.00009483648,0.0001492508,0.0004603375,0.2749095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806836,0.0009798389,0.01361994,0.001040562,0.0001168115,0.00004513633,0.00001566033,0.00003089196,0.003467434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008411594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03261179,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008473791995972353,"score_gpt":0.2212787288254178,"score_spread":0.2128049368294455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}