{"id":"W4306923006","doi":"10.1130/g50258.1","title":"Fault surface morphology as an indicator for earthquake nucleation potential","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geology","topic":"earthquake and tectonic studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geology; Nucleation; Slip (aerodynamics); Asperity (geotechnical engineering); Surface finish; Fault (geology); Fault plane; Surface roughness; Isotropy; Fractal; Surface (topology); Microscale chemistry; Mineralogy; Geometry; Seismology; Geotechnical engineering; Materials science; Composite material; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003024969,0.0001045373,0.0001761926,0.00006755382,0.0006077093,0.0000120891,0.0002088561,0.00006979989,0.01686502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003496751,0.0001021515,0.00005784045,0.0001084333,0.0001243609,0.0000779281,0.00003932751,0.0001618831,0.0004745425],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003642117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005684723,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001868295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001464421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988353,0.0001604558,0.0001651244,0.0003266463,0.00014373,0.0003687746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995242,0.00012493,0.00008133042,0.0001719594,0.00002510135,0.0000724969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006455583,0.0001652278,0.819788,0.00001805217,0.0001697725,0.0001635045,0.00184173,0.04913505,0.0004078002,0.003086341,0.008504816,0.1160741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001004074,0.002355084,0.9195107,5.36143e-7,0.00002971802,0.0002798484,0.001138159,0.005137072,0.00006636002,0.006141926,0.0640934,0.0002431636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952185,0.0003905247,0.0001203456,0.0009953046,0.001066245,0.0002367412,0.0001069138,0.00006825605,0.001797162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969111,0.000021668,0.0005912076,0.001033093,0.0001174117,0.000008195948,0.0003759041,0.000004601,0.0009368031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.115831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01287189897763534,"score_gpt":0.2291528738753552,"score_spread":0.2162809748977199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}