{"id":"W4307150897","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1510","title":"Assessing Treatment Response after Lung SABR: An Evaluation of the Predictive Value of RECIST Criteria","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics","topic":"Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; SABR volatility model; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Lung; Lung cancer; Lesion; Radiology; Target lesion; Radiation therapy; Nuclear medicine; Ablative case; Progressive disease; Radiosurgery; Internal medicine; Surgery; Chemotherapy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008744417,0.0006717303,0.00130455,0.002418206,0.0004020929,0.001386665,0.001038538,0.0009987316,0.001859054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02279574,0.0001622058,0.0008963391,0.001155753,0.0005165218,0.001208549,0.0007239053,0.00102522,0.0005334034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000631389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007186387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001698166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002029247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970367,0.001344438,0.00034711,0.000340757,0.0007554853,0.0001756746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803956,0.01335761,0.002266867,0.0008163287,0.002186736,0.0009768904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005648883,0.0002112741,0.935846,0.0001462797,0.000304589,0.0001757593,0.0001925325,0.002904753,0.001234996,0.0002605884,0.0008584299,0.05221587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002288861,0.003570222,0.9449212,0.0001305383,0.0008956196,0.001758697,0.000594957,0.03835152,0.002979265,0.001101834,0.00539808,0.00006912636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799598,0.004591051,0.003467794,0.0005460131,0.0001079481,0.0001979733,0.0009224153,0.000130364,0.01007663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996954,0.0003258201,0.001448001,0.00007570831,0.00006328231,0.00005098501,0.0005377903,0.00002935534,0.000515117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04624546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03934123145894466,"score_gpt":0.4141406873371186,"score_spread":0.3747994558781739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}