{"id":"W4307493350","doi":"10.1007/s10822-022-00483-0","title":"Physicochemical QSAR analysis of hERG inhibition revisited: towards a quantitative potency prediction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Diabetes Canada","funders":"","keywords":"hERG; Interpretability; Quantitative structure–activity relationship; ADME; Cross-validation; Computer science; Potency; Drug discovery; Applicability domain; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Machine learning; Drug; Pharmacology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009785333,0.0007909235,0.001168912,0.0007932266,0.0001371556,0.0009581535,0.0007248665,0.0003978247,0.001787792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002374807,0.0002212834,0.001113666,0.0008013609,0.0003877841,0.0007226639,0.000396554,0.001155241,0.0005165819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003717822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005329687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001863456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001258133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995159,0.0002174026,0.00002777101,0.00004855092,0.0001495802,0.00004081268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992713,0.000408605,0.0001105662,0.00008736519,0.0001091348,0.00001309267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003478621,0.000331819,0.005625041,0.0005827427,0.0003117874,0.0002561676,0.00005127572,0.7369184,0.1474115,0.01576676,0.001780813,0.09061586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001612275,0.000244157,0.001960186,0.00001054789,0.00007319577,0.0000727671,0.0000116538,0.9837066,0.01080581,0.002285459,0.0007990756,0.00001444321],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2563958,0.004875603,0.7254604,0.00109099,0.00009248916,0.0001935105,0.001777751,0.001410768,0.008702784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684598,0.001855045,0.02711021,0.0002024025,0.00006079667,0.00005789989,0.0006152015,0.00008096429,0.001557688],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001863456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00598073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02866884183169466,"score_gpt":0.299158298156579,"score_spread":0.2704894563248844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}