{"id":"W4308566832","doi":"10.1111/joac.12523","title":"Paying for ecological services in Ecuador: The political economy of structural inequality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Livelihood; Agrarian society; Carbon sequestration; Politics; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Payment for ecosystem services; Political science; Ecosystem services; Geography; Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecology; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005570395,0.00005515144,0.0001241871,0.00004487268,0.0001674249,0.00001450389,0.000303986,0.00002038972,0.0005652547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001098714,0.00003570635,0.00008221906,0.0001062501,0.000064664,0.00009987673,0.0003169627,0.0001157447,0.000001359717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001701612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000740368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003251085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992805,0.0001027246,0.0002460226,0.00007949025,0.0001373284,0.0001540082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995692,0.00008758549,0.000211317,0.0000762796,0.00001029501,0.00004525602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005989871,0.00006843369,0.9953247,0.00002750859,0.00001716643,0.000009850777,0.001873299,0.0000938265,0.00003050162,0.0006197504,0.0002164771,0.00165854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004100399,0.0001691588,0.9792661,0.000003015921,0.00001733197,0.000008399889,0.007088601,0.0003300675,0.00002410168,0.005953082,0.006679697,0.00005038594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853068,0.00002928171,0.000004813703,0.01338833,0.000112764,0.0001942683,0.00002208614,0.000001963124,0.0009396753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971073,0.000001408546,0.0000955456,0.002701019,0.00007070022,0.000007253951,0.000003216962,0.000001527403,0.00001199653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01605863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6189142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04449380736150065,"score_gpt":0.2479389585756216,"score_spread":0.203445151214121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}