{"id":"W4308615637","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14657517.v2","title":"A matter of choice : a critical discourse analysis of ECEC policy in Canada's 2006 federal election","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Critical discourse analysis; Dominance (genetics); Discourse analysis; Nominalization; Newspaper; Politics; Federal election; Hegemony; Political science; Representation (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Media studies; Ideology; Linguistics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01592277,0.0008284015,0.000812381,0.01041633,0.04181227,0.02125777,0.002150222,0.00270195,0.002026167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03057051,0.0004523374,0.0003972084,0.01331506,0.03077511,0.004959595,0.00400376,0.00421733,0.0001293143],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2534928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1969519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9659333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887577,0.004389157,0.0003542452,0.0008975804,0.003433551,0.002167894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673391,0.02147637,0.001519191,0.0005102297,0.007658256,0.001496943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006411949,0.00002703701,0.003579412,0.0001110493,0.000007849445,0.0003210409,0.9381643,0.0002230199,0.0003869774,0.04369419,0.003015248,0.01040579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009810444,0.00001059236,0.007968355,0.0002905121,0.00001426656,0.00004870685,0.9133512,0.0005266143,0.0007052551,0.003282004,0.07375135,0.00004126182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8837435,0.003565083,0.003546905,0.02545544,0.0003515839,0.0004274843,0.0006807285,0.00005145752,0.08217782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084,0.0007866559,0.001394548,0.0006587421,0.00004115713,0.0001017099,0.0001443939,0.00003185719,0.006000942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2534928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8658426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01422871755333902,"score_gpt":0.3516098584645466,"score_spread":0.3373811409112076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}