{"id":"W4308709898","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15971","title":"Metaphors To Design By: Developing Representations of Engineering Design","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering design process; Computer science; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Design thinking; Design education; Design process; Metaphor; Mathematics education; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Engineering; Epistemology; Work in process; Linguistics; Visual arts","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005567717,0.00137029,0.0005405574,0.002054015,0.001659249,0.007611393,0.001638955,0.001989076,0.009227501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01959498,0.000687764,0.001034745,0.001376186,0.007962703,0.01209705,0.004150428,0.003601508,0.001594513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002166737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002785827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002042821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002317372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958104,0.003232082,0.0001430533,0.0002858686,0.0003994482,0.0001291733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917842,0.0058537,0.0004068766,0.001033295,0.0005818181,0.0003401609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002236582,0.00003033325,0.0002498511,0.0002871529,0.00001083019,0.0001398546,0.02673893,0.002229119,0.0009641409,0.9256544,0.008671192,0.03500177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005315451,0.00007701177,0.0002668488,0.0007015971,0.00002683396,0.0006726083,0.01360555,0.02065521,0.001646444,0.5884214,0.37382,0.00005324122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01193754,0.001283447,0.926612,0.006582497,0.000363697,0.0002172248,0.0001642101,0.001171096,0.05166827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1796838,0.001420032,0.8057305,0.000680755,0.00006803182,0.0005049882,0.0002915237,0.0005551936,0.01106521],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009227501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03086913,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01534027248335156,"score_gpt":0.2273955247199976,"score_spread":0.2120552522366461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}