{"id":"W4308713276","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi.15910","title":"Two tales of the Design Thinking Process for the Sustainable Energy Canadian Engineering Grand Challenge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Critical thinking; Energy (signal processing); Engineering design process; Engineering ethics; Natural (archaeology); Engineering management; Sustainable energy; Engineering; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Architectural engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Geography; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02217657,0.001259015,0.000448332,0.002092279,0.0168083,0.01805736,0.002640635,0.005171466,0.01112902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02584857,0.0006472706,0.0008218313,0.001766991,0.02410688,0.007732494,0.009432052,0.01254683,0.001995974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03441404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07019489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2401442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3822078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9806904,0.008813074,0.0003369866,0.00132029,0.006025884,0.002813291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818999,0.005247185,0.0005132721,0.001783081,0.004978266,0.005578334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001570184,0.0002320767,0.002343794,0.0003677287,0.00002936158,0.0009632906,0.1237546,0.002851364,0.002855059,0.5886567,0.1585367,0.1192524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004060459,0.0001211661,0.001775336,0.0004550332,0.0000124022,0.0004130957,0.07083763,0.002864851,0.001438999,0.1424191,0.7794251,0.0001966624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0676101,0.006866257,0.2118985,0.4256649,0.009205169,0.001358121,0.0004405385,0.0008457602,0.2761107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5442293,0.004490726,0.217287,0.03074708,0.0006490229,0.001078548,0.0004998273,0.00101992,0.1999985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2401442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4774928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01035621322054925,"score_gpt":0.2142702406882613,"score_spread":0.2039140274677121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}