{"id":"W4308917580","doi":"10.1109/jsen.2022.3210346","title":"Novel Calibration Methodologies for Compliant, Multiaxis, Fiber-Optic-Based Force/Torque Sensors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Sensors Journal","topic":"Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Kriging; Calibration; Torque; Nonlinear system; Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Electronic engineering; Control engineering; Algorithm; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Machine learning; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001551138,0.0008482869,0.0004973021,0.0008198594,0.0002998464,0.0006535517,0.001291927,0.001097827,0.001078961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003072526,0.0004862598,0.0004331802,0.0007224772,0.0004930968,0.00159452,0.0008565717,0.0009066332,0.0004573189],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004241275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004955655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003825498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007969189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982244,0.0002446267,0.0001034712,0.0003297986,0.001047645,0.00004992223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986613,0.0003160189,0.0004027461,0.0002307781,0.0003618265,0.00002738563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368087,0.0002063106,0.001412073,0.0005145316,0.00007598745,0.0001322568,0.0002744165,0.03938778,0.6154757,0.008034885,0.001335262,0.333014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003553565,0.0003161831,0.002820357,0.00005267624,0.00003898647,0.0007234247,0.00007375829,0.4801781,0.4992317,0.002766351,0.01364431,0.0001187412],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009505836,0.0003057077,0.9891354,0.0000714843,0.00005270932,0.00006021591,0.00002394114,0.0003988067,0.0004458966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1922914,0.000618234,0.8051133,0.0001386464,0.00005616962,0.0001635787,0.0001021578,0.0001148521,0.001401782],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001551138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008203268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1182280044601352,"score_gpt":0.3163932186137794,"score_spread":0.1981652141536442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}