{"id":"W4309097502","doi":"10.1002/eap.2777","title":"Quantifying and linking mechanism scenarios to invasive species impact","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biodiversity; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Invasive species; Competitor analysis; Biology; Ecosystem; Impact assessment; Ecological niche; Niche; Environmental resource management; Geography; Habitat; Environmental science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001982407,0.00008014463,0.0001041389,0.00002980602,0.001169417,0.00001715047,0.0001609623,0.00003198723,0.003402333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004527973,0.00006973048,0.00003263991,0.0002469262,0.00009166361,0.00004269876,0.0007265636,0.0001515843,0.0002977834],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001770397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008527033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001528782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004799916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992787,0.00004676072,0.0001258772,0.000266675,0.0001004263,0.0001816034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995304,0.0002321398,0.00004926382,0.0001101357,0.000006110663,0.0000719888],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019003,0.0005322541,0.7736387,0.000009708097,0.00005464877,0.00001056762,0.002323233,0.03783382,0.01678953,0.1648393,0.001799937,0.002148162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121777,0.000213637,0.9603299,9.812414e-7,0.00001169596,0.00001155224,0.0006530934,0.001566202,0.00006209543,0.02989409,0.006976799,0.0001581614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863141,0.00001947077,0.006193424,0.002072129,0.00003864017,0.0006147195,0.00001944698,0.00005922025,0.0046689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946094,0.00001888493,0.002919171,0.0008779311,0.00001601296,0.001068958,0.00001202601,0.000004602251,0.0004730781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1866913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03231148702986208,"score_gpt":0.2780171346037493,"score_spread":0.2457056475738872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}