{"id":"W4309456555","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence10040109","title":"When Type 2 Processing Misfires: The Indiscriminate Use of Statistical Thinking about Reasoning Problems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intelligence","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Universidade de Lisboa; Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Base (topology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Sensitivity (control systems); Outcome (game theory); Process (computing); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02460577,0.000777546,0.001020927,0.001213885,0.000655721,0.005171378,0.001643697,0.003464184,0.002644619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.226238,0.001018461,0.0005525592,0.0007792814,0.004121641,0.006006821,0.002888996,0.005329262,0.0005049172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008265884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000913932,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005990963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005190275,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776133,0.009298363,0.0019574,0.002777938,0.007481187,0.0008718424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8039363,0.1291014,0.02544726,0.03265797,0.006235379,0.002621704],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01012952,0.002256743,0.345179,0.001564471,0.0009007035,0.004676143,0.03082272,0.01165034,0.2326511,0.1027973,0.01001493,0.2473571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007696024,0.001748148,0.3038149,0.0005418156,0.000483606,0.008490634,0.00973425,0.08110014,0.131005,0.444453,0.01712989,0.0007288902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9264845,0.0002615055,0.05520875,0.002863834,0.0002414986,0.0001790043,0.0001204941,0.0004928756,0.01414754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770964,0.0001144075,0.01963375,0.001800116,0.00009228702,0.0001684119,0.0001087262,0.0002085553,0.0007774178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02460577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1301293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2116825223068161,"score_gpt":0.4100245964887314,"score_spread":0.1983420741819152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}