{"id":"W4309494747","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0277769","title":"Science in motion: A qualitative analysis of journalists’ use and perception of preprints","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Misinformation; Public relations; Skepticism; Journalism; Science communication; Politics; Social media; Pandemic; Perception; Preprint; Jargon; Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Media studies; Social science; Medicine; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04071872,0.0005326602,0.001116932,0.003362342,0.01043657,0.008048881,0.002002748,0.003066845,0.003497238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08611063,0.0008947878,0.0005437969,0.003430189,0.01204503,0.007003175,0.006475995,0.003884152,0.0005499932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00649666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008246835,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007344523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008832895,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9539831,0.03640319,0.001522818,0.001758654,0.002986727,0.003345453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8467565,0.128012,0.008219811,0.002204407,0.00875519,0.006052043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004427574,0.00002353704,0.002680562,0.0001716243,0.00000428091,0.000348652,0.9928242,0.0000199918,0.0006149535,0.0008844885,0.0004691558,0.001914256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005020108,0.00002739056,0.0009735314,0.000113608,0.000002826497,0.00008722385,0.9920343,0.00004126911,0.0001667933,0.0003784767,0.006156925,0.00001258082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739448,0.0009540318,0.006463303,0.008422516,0.0002170011,0.0003822585,0.0005558397,0.0000449016,0.009015357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889364,0.0008446812,0.002855477,0.002929511,0.0000844945,0.0007695727,0.0002068303,0.00008805306,0.003285062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2153438,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3390972285114633,"score_gpt":0.46338864186939,"score_spread":0.1242914133579268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}